what oft was thought, but ne’er so well expressed

True wit is nature to advantage dressed,
What oft was thought, but ne'er so well expressed,
Something, whose truth convinced at sight we find,
That gives us back the notion of the mind.
( Alexander Pope, "An Essay On Criticism" [1711] part 2, lines 297-300)

And wasn't it Shaw (it was always Shaw, Wilde, or Dorothy Parker) who said that the difference between nonfiction and novels was that anyone could read their own biography and think "ah, my secret is safe" while Anna Karenina would read Anna Karenina and burst out crying, "How did he know? How did he know?"

Not that this has anything to do with the video which follows, a version of Sleepless in Seattle recut as a horror movie, and not that I have recognized anything, ever. So stop looking at me like that.

And I'm not defensive, either.

Stolen heartlessly from the Ireneo's Memory blog.


3 thoughts on “what oft was thought, but ne’er so well expressed

  1. [...] via Fark. We always knew someone would push Milton too far one day. Best slasher trailer since Sleepless in Seattle. [...]

  2. [...] criteria were as follows: wit, relevance, and the containment of wisdom which, as Alexander Pope said, “Oft was thought, but ne’er so well expressed.” And this comment in the Not [...]

  3. [...] How does it go? “What oft was thought, but ne’er so well expressed.” [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s