Comments on: mass murders, zeta males, and virtual life

By: raincoaster

raincoaster — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:24:37 +0000

Now, Paul, don’t take things so personally! If you can’t handle a light crack in a comments section, the Internet is no place for you.

By: Paul Elam

Paul Elam — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:48:42 +0000

Wow. Is your ego tied up in this or what? If your skin is that thin, you ought to find a different hobby. Perhaps you could take up something that covers your light bill.

Have a nice life, asshole.

By: raincoaster

raincoaster — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:30:06 +0000

Paul, maybe you qualify. You seem to have a lot of time on your hands.

By: Paul Elam

Paul Elam — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:14:56 +0000

Correct your search term by putting it in quotation marks to rule out all returns that simply have zeta and male in the same body of text. The actual return on “zeta male” is a little over 5,000, barely a scratch in internet terms.

And it still goes down to definition and frequency of use. Since most of the real returns on zeta male come back in reference to the fraternal organization, then we must infer that the expression is not being used to actually classify at type of male, as you and I have.

And the rest of the returns don’t indicate anything that one might infer has social significance, or even relevance.

I would say it leaves things pretty well open.

By: raincoaster

raincoaster — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:59:05 +0000

There are 1.2 million references for “zeta male” at this point. I think that’s enough.