Skip navigation

Quiz: what kind of 30’s wife would you be?

The Women

cross-posted from TeenyManolo and I really wonder how the relative demographics will stack up. According to the data I can find, this blog skews strongly male, considerably more intelligent and educated than average, and with a substantially lower income than average. Ah, my people. At least, all my ex-boyfriends.

While I’ve long suspected I would not flourish in the era, it must be admitted that I love watching Thirties movies, and am slightly addicted to the bizarre hats of the period.

But it’s not a problem. I can stop wearing those hats any time. Seriously. And I’m sure the staff at Home Depot and the grocery store wishes I would.

But now comes scientific(ish) proof, once and for all, that I’d be an absolutely rotten Thirties housewife. I find solace in the fact that so would Katherine Hepburn and Myrna Loy. Oh, who wants to be that insipid martyr Mrs. Stephen Haines, when you could be the fabulously kooky Irene Bullock or the witty and wonderful Nora Charles? They’d both be fabulous failures in this quiz, too.

23

As a 1930s wife, I am
Very Poor (Failure)

Take the test!

via ArchiesArchive

So what did you get?

Scoring:

0-24 – Very Poor (Failure)
25-41 – Poor
42-58 – Average
59-75 – Superior
76+ – Very Superior

If it makes you feel any better, you can answer for your husband on the 1930’s Husband Quiz as well. Don’t tell him the results; it would only upset the poor darling.

48 Comments

  1. Posted June 23, 2008 at 1:21 am | Permalink

    Hmmmm . . . . if I were a 30’s wife it would probably be a tossup between James Whale and Ernest Thesiger

  2. Posted June 23, 2008 at 1:30 am | Permalink

    Ha. Ha. Take the test! There’s no estrogen detector on it.

  3. Posted June 23, 2008 at 1:32 am | Permalink

    Why so bitchy, dear?

  4. Posted June 23, 2008 at 1:37 am | Permalink

    I’m a bitch; or didn’t you read the results. I’m Joan Fucking Crawford, I am!

  5. Posted June 23, 2008 at 2:02 am | Permalink

    they all look like they’re ready to be snatched away by King Kong!

  6. Posted June 23, 2008 at 2:08 am | Permalink

    King Kong wouldn’t mess with a dame like Ros.

  7. Posted June 23, 2008 at 2:17 am | Permalink

    I got a 31. Poor. I actually thought I would have been a good 30’s wife, I guess I was wrong.

  8. Posted June 23, 2008 at 2:51 am | Permalink

    I lost points for the boozing and red nail polish, and running around the house in my sock feet. I must be a terrible slut.

  9. Posted June 23, 2008 at 2:58 am | Permalink

    41 as a wife
    125 as a husband

    My wife must be a bitch
    My husband must be a self-righteous bastard

  10. Posted June 23, 2008 at 3:24 am | Permalink

    Awesome. Will you marry me and keep me in booze and nail polish? And before Metro points it out, they can sub in for one another if you do it right.

  11. Annette Fix
    Posted June 23, 2008 at 7:13 am | Permalink

    I actually thought I’d do well, but I scored a 22. Maybe it was because of the part about cooking canned food in my pjs that did it…

  12. Posted June 23, 2008 at 7:58 am | Permalink

    Uh oh. I scored 20. That means no man is going to marry me right?

    I am cursed, I tell you, cursed.

  13. Posted June 23, 2008 at 9:25 am | Permalink

    Well, no really, really OLD men are going to marry you, so look on the bright side.

  14. Posted June 23, 2008 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    Wow, I’ve got a better chance of getting a husband than does Max . . . .

  15. G Eagle Esq
    Posted June 23, 2008 at 11:50 am | Permalink

    Doomed

    We’re all Doomed

    DON’T PANIC

    I didn’t realize FFE is in danger of becoming an Episcopalian

  16. Posted June 23, 2008 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    Oh, SNAP!

  17. Posted June 23, 2008 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    I got 13. Maybe I misunderstood the marital congress question.

    Great 30’s movie: The Women. Perfect for a rainy Sunday.

  18. Posted June 23, 2008 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    The blogger at Seismic Twitch got zero. Archie claims his wife got a negative number, but I think he fixed the text.

  19. Posted June 23, 2008 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    Archie – I was a closet Anglican one

    Ella – they’re always getting that confused in India’s Congress Party, but the mass meetings are a hoot all the same . . . .

  20. Posted June 23, 2008 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

    I would guess so. Thank god those old white dudes in Washington know the difference; nobody wants to see THAT!

  21. Posted June 23, 2008 at 8:47 pm | Permalink

    Marital congress–that involves 100 people, right?

    @FFE: Nail polish comes in different colours so that Raincoaster can drink B-52s.

    And yes, in a pinch she’ll drink the fuel out of a B-52 as well. The biggest hit to her wallet has been the price of gasoline. Nowadays she might as well buy cooking wine.

    99 as a husband. I’m going to be very smug about that if my wife ever comes home again.

    25 as a wife. Obviously I’m very well adapted.

  22. Posted June 23, 2008 at 9:06 pm | Permalink

    Like I said on TeenyManolo, obviously they set the bar lower on the male side of the marital congress.

  23. Posted June 23, 2008 at 9:30 pm | Permalink

    Clearly I must do away with FFE if I want to find myself a man. Sorry, FFE, it is just one of those survival of the fittest things, nothing personal.

  24. Posted June 24, 2008 at 1:51 am | Permalink

    Don’t worry Max – as long as I can be Myrna Loy and William Powell, there’s no competition between us.

  25. Posted June 24, 2008 at 1:54 am | Permalink

    Metro – actually, marital congress involves 100 people in one house and 435 in the next house, but there are chaplains in each house . . . .

  26. Posted June 24, 2008 at 2:01 am | Permalink

    style=”text-align: center;”>40As a 1930s wife, I amPoorTake the test!

    Whhhaaaat? I thought I did everything right but it wasn’t enough!

    As for you, dear, Rain, I’m not surprised! We would have made perfect neighbors back in the day!

  27. Posted June 24, 2008 at 2:44 am | Permalink

    You are not NEARLY milquetoasty enough for this. I can see us bitching over the back fence in my mind’s eye.

  28. G Eagle Esq
    Posted June 24, 2008 at 6:39 am | Permalink

    Bonjour, Senor FFE

    I’m not Spartacus

    Vote Quimby

    Yr obedient servant etc

    G E

  29. Posted June 24, 2008 at 10:28 am | Permalink

    M. Eagle – or, as Tony Curtis would say, Spah-tu-cuth

  30. Posted June 24, 2008 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    Oh God I got 83 – a superior 1930’s wife. Trouble is the only chap I know who wants to turn the clock back is already married and isn’t exactly a fan of mine. My ex is a very modern male -> he f***ed off.

    I was discussing Canada t’other day and thought it would be great to visit and if you could visit us, Raincoaster. When I win the lottery your ticket to Blighty is the first thing I’ll buy :-)

  31. Posted June 24, 2008 at 8:32 pm | Permalink

    And if I win the lottery the first thing I will buy is…my freedom from debt. The second thing is a damn fine lawyer. The third thing is a trip, and England is definitely on the top of the list there.

  32. Posted June 24, 2008 at 9:42 pm | Permalink

    You wouldn’t plan on stalking Boris and Blair, would you?

  33. Posted June 24, 2008 at 9:51 pm | Permalink

    Oh, PERISH the thought. If they’d only indicate they’d pick up the tab for lunch, I might stalk them for a day or so, though. Only if they asked nicely.

    Besides, if I wanted to stalk Blair wouldn’t I go to Geneva and ambush him outside his bank?

  34. Posted June 24, 2008 at 10:39 pm | Permalink

    Bory’s a tory. They never pay for lunches–not even their own.

  35. Posted June 24, 2008 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

    This is true. Apparently when he moved into the mayor’s office they found a wine cooler (I will need to explain to the trailer-parkier readers that this is a refrigerator sort of thing, not a product from Bartles and Jaymes) with about 100 bottles. I last heard they were down to 36. I hope they save a few for me!

  36. Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:10 am | Permalink

    I heard that Labour sleazoids had tried to smear Boris by filling old wine bottles up with Vimto-esque cordial, blowing a bit of dust on them and then alerting the authorities to the new Mayor plundering possesions of persons unmet and unknown.

    All total bollocks, obviously. (a lesser known brand of cordial made by a socialist atheist commune on the Isle of Wight)

  37. Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    Don’t be silly: he’s English. He’d drink it anyway.

  38. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    Well, if he’d married me, he’d be drinking in secret, out of the house and not with my pin money.

    If I’d married her, she’d be the ball at our next drinking club rugby match.

  39. Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:10 pm | Permalink

    Oh! A wine cooler. The Old Man got me one for Christmas. But mine only holds eight. You think he’d get me one big enough to hold a case and some coke.

  40. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

    You meant to capitalize that “C”, right?

  41. Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:31 am | Permalink

    Oops.

    BTW, ot, but, have you gotten anything in the mail lately? Anything random????

  42. Posted June 26, 2008 at 6:41 am | Permalink

    You missed my post on the Man of Mystery? Honestly, I’m ashamed of myself that it took me a whole day to think of just Googling the name. Thank you, I have enjoyed it.

    Many, many times.

    Now I want Gladiator sandals for my birthday! Fortunately, they’ll all go on sale in a week or so, so I might actually get some!

  43. Posted June 27, 2008 at 2:08 am | Permalink

    Those damn Gladiator sandals. By the time they’re available they’ll be as ancient as Sarah Jessica Parker. Oh what the hell, I’d still wear ‘em.

    Wait – did you say on sale? So they are available????

    Gladiator remains my favorite movie. I wish Russell Crowe were available for purchase. He can throw a telephone at me anytime!

  44. Posted June 27, 2008 at 9:00 am | Permalink

    From what I hear from informed sources, he’s available for borrowing at the very least!

  45. Posted June 27, 2008 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    What? What do you mean? Do you mean what I think you mean? But he’s married!

    Straight borrowing, right?

  46. Posted June 27, 2008 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    Straight borrowing. Have to return him before midnight or there’s a fine, too.

  47. Posted June 28, 2008 at 1:18 am | Permalink

    Hot dayum! Perhaps it was a smart move attempting to befriend his wife on myspace.

    Do your sources know if she knows? Or does she even care? Just how sordid does this get?

  48. Posted June 28, 2008 at 7:19 am | Permalink

    All I know is, he was out with the wife at a London club, started working the room, he and his pal disappeared into the back through the kitchen with two barely-legal blondes, returned half an hour later without the blondes. You connect the dots.

    Wife did not bat an eye, but maybe she didn’t know he was gone.


One Trackback/Pingback

  1. [...] where i nabbed that quiz : i nabbed that quiz at rain’s [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*