Comments on: quiz: which felony are you? http://raincoaster.com/2008/09/08/quiz-which-felony-are-you/ 49 degrees latitude, 360 degrees attitude! Sat, 02 Jun 2012 17:32:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Jae http://raincoaster.com/2008/09/08/quiz-which-felony-are-you/#comment-262710 Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:16:04 +0000 http://raincoaster.wordpress.com/?p=4682#comment-262710 Wow. I’m Arson. Ok then.

Stalking huh? *trying to keep the smile off my face*
Who woulda figured?

]]> By: ian in hamburg http://raincoaster.com/2008/09/08/quiz-which-felony-are-you/#comment-262708 Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:34:53 +0000 http://raincoaster.wordpress.com/?p=4682#comment-262708 Oh yeah. Can you say malignant narcissist? I bet she could.

]]> By: raincoaster http://raincoaster.com/2008/09/08/quiz-which-felony-are-you/#comment-262677 Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:34:30 +0000 http://raincoaster.wordpress.com/?p=4682#comment-262677 Yes, and for the record the consensus in Vancouver is that she’s not only a whackjob, but an evil one as well. Those are two separate issues: I know a lot of officially “insane” people, but very few of them are evil.

]]> By: raincoaster http://raincoaster.com/2008/09/08/quiz-which-felony-are-you/#comment-262676 Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:33:42 +0000 http://raincoaster.wordpress.com/?p=4682#comment-262676 Stony, Raul, yes. She’s got a long history of stalkerish behavior and tried to cost one man his career; fortunately, he fought back and set the record straight, but unfortunately Simon Fraser University had already paid her for her claims, and then they just paid him for his. They should have sued her.

Her blog’s here on WP, I know, because when I made a comment in off-topic about “ick, I think she’s FLIRTING with me” which she was, she dropped a comment. She’s probably got her name on Google Alerts and the only reason we haven’t seen her here is: 1 no direct links to her blog and 2 comments aren’t indexed by Google.

]]> By: ian in hamburg http://raincoaster.com/2008/09/08/quiz-which-felony-are-you/#comment-262675 Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:34:47 +0000 http://raincoaster.wordpress.com/?p=4682#comment-262675 Rain – thanks for all those links.

You MUST go to her blog (I won’t like to it but its got something to do with daily drive-by —- anyway she whines and pouts about how the national post didn’t print her self-serving letter to the editor! I laughed and laughed – then wrote the post myself and congratulated them on their good judgement.

Her missive:
Canada will never have a Sarah Palin – a strong, thoroughly originally, politically incorrect conservative woman with a controversial personal life – because we all get driven down to the USA. Sarah Palin would be burned at the stake in Canada and drummed out of town – by the very people who wrote your editorial. I should know; I’ve been there.

Controversial personal life? How about stalker on steroids?

]]>