As I cross-posted on the Shebeen Club Blog:
Undermining Freedom of Expression in China: the Role of Yahoo!, Microsoft, and Google
‘and of course, the information society’s very life blood is freedom. it is freedom that enables citizens everywhere to benefit from knowledge, journalists to do their essential work, and citizens to hold government accountable. Without openness, without the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers, the information revolution will stall, and the information society we hope to build will be stillborn.’
Kofi Annan, UN Secretary General
Recommendations for Action
Amnesty International calls on Yahoo!, Microsoft, Google and other Internet companies operating in China to:
1. Publicly commit to honouring the freedom of expression provision in the Chinese constitution and lobby for the release of all cyber-dissidents and journalists imprisoned solely for the peaceful and legitimate exercise of their freedom of expression.
2. Be transparent about the filtering process used by the company in China and around the world and make public what words and phrases are filtered and how these words are selected.
3. Make publicly available all agreements between the company and the Chinese government with implications for censorship of information and suppression of dissent.
4. Exhaust all judicial remedies and appeals in China and internationally before complying with state directives where these have human rights implications. Make known to the government the company’s principled opposition to implementing any requests or directives which breach international human rights norms whenever such pressures are applied.
5. Develop an explicit human rights policy that states the company’s support for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and complies with the UN Norms for Business and the UN Global Compact’s principle on avoiding complicity in human rights violations.
6. Clarify to what extent human rights considerations are taken into account in the processes and procedures that the company undertakes in deciding whether and how the company’s values and reputation will be compromised if it assists governments to censor access to the Internet.
7. Exercise leadership in promoting human rights in China through lobbying the government for legislative and social reform in line with international human rights standards, through seeking clarification of the existing legal framework and through adopting business practices that encourage China to comply with its human rights obligations.
8. Participate in and support the outcomes of a multi-stakeholder process to develop a set of guidelines relating to the Internet and human rights issues, as well as mechanisms for their implementation and verification, as part of broader efforts to promote recognition of the body of human rights principles applicable to companies.
Read the whole report online or download it here.
raincoaster 
You might want to check this where information supplied by Yahoo! helped journalist Shi Tao get 10 years in prison.
Thanks, ahmad. Google founders initially said they were horrified by the restrictions the Chinese government imposed, but when faced with “put up or shut up” they shut up and kept the access. They had the opportunity to push China, and they did not do it for fear of losing market share.
The Jeddah blog here on WordPress reported that Google in English is blocked in Saudi Arabia. Smart people that they are, they saw that it was perfectly accessible in every other language, so so much for censorship!