TO terrorists: the unusual suspects

Shareef Abdelhaleem, suspect under arrestAssuming, for the moment and quite against my usual instincts, that all human beings are individuals and act for their own, entirely independent and logical reasons rather than relieve the desperate burden of sentience by subsuming themselves in a larger, and mindless, whole, here is a backgrounder (let us avoid the word "roundup" for obvious taste-related reasons, for lo, we are way PC y'all) of the individual suspects arrested in Mississauga, a suburb which has never, let's face it, had much to recommend it except that it is not Scarborough. Apparently, according to another story in the G&M, the Peace Tower in Ottawa was among the intended targets.

One notes with amusement, one does, the Guardian's breathlessly clueless description of the suspects "ranging [all the incredible way] from college educated to unemployed." That's walking distance 'round these parts, sweetheart.

Canuckistan

Not that I'm bitter.

From the Globe and Mail's really very thorough backgrounder.

Saad Khalid, Ahmad Mustafa Ghany [about whom Canuckistan Terroristone notes the Globe and Mail is nearly as clueless as the Guardian; surely we have proof, dating back at least to 9/11, that a life of privilege doesn't deter one from acts of terrorism], Steven Vikash Chand a.k.a. Abdul Shakur, Jahmaal James, Zakaria Amara, Asad Ansari, and [very Bonnie-and-Clyde-sounding] "Kingston Duo" Mohammed Dirie, 22, and Yasim Abdi Mohamed, 24.

For many Muslims in this city, the focus now shifts to preparing for a potential backlash, which some faced in the weeks and months following the attacks on New York in 2001 and London in 2005. When a co-worker jokingly told Mr. Khan this weekend that he expected to see his name on the list of RCMP suspects, it only added to Mr. Khan's suspicion that Canadian Muslims may have to brace for a blow to their reputation.

God help the last two if they're innocent; once you've got a catchy moniker, it's all over but the posing with Spiderman.

Spidey and baddie

remember

tank man, after

This is the anniversary that most of the world appears happy to have forgotten. Indeed, they've been working hard to bury the memory of what happened in Tiananmen Square and here am I, almost two decades later, still boycotting China. Why? Because there has been no advance whatsoever in the acknowledgement of fundamental human rights in China in all this time. None. Children are still being enslaved, free-thinkers are still being executed, rebellions are still being extinguished.

The People's Revolution

I don't say there have been no changes.

You can make money. Indeed, nowadays in China you must make money, which is like saying mandatory abortion is the same as freedom of choice. There are those to whom the freedom to make money is the only freedom, and those people are thrilled to the core of their being, which is just under the (very) thin skin. The rest of us, however, have seen no meaningful change in China except a creeping shamelessness about their authoritarianism. It's time to admit that capitalism does not make democracy inevitable; in fact, slavery is inherently capitalistic.

Hooking multinational corporations on the cheap (slave) labour, blowing up schoolchildren who are forced to work with explosives instead of taking lessons, poisoning townspeople, hoping to drive them from your rival's restaurant to your own, the New China can in no sense be considered an improvement on the old.

Just ask Taiwan.

As these multinationals, with vast international influence and no human accountability, become dependent on the cheap labour and salivate at the possibility of a billion-customer base, they sing the praises of a nation whose sole achievement is to give them something they want desperately.

Whores always praise their dealers.

I say it's time we all detoxed, came down off the cheap labour high and realized that China, which once enslaved their own people and co-opted local leaders, has now enslaved and co-opted all of us.

tank man

From the Guardian today, news of suppression and arrests. Quel suprise

China Marks Tiananmen Square Anniversary


Sunday June 4, 2006 2:16 PM

AP Photo XHG104

By ALEXA OLESEN

Associated Press Writer

BEIJING (AP) – Chinese police tore up a protester's poster and detained at least two people on Beijing's Tiananmen Square on Sunday as the country marked 17 years since local troops crushed a pro-democracy demonstration in the public space.

An elderly woman tried to pull out a poster with apparently political material written on it, but police ripped it up and then took her away in a van.

A farmer tried to stage a protest apparently unrelated to the 1989 crackdown, but he also was taken away in a van.

After dawn, a group of tourists tried to open a banner while posing for a photo, catching the attention of police, who quickly forced them to put the nonpolitical material away. They were not detained.

Discussion of the crackdown is still taboo in China outside of the semiautonomous regions of Hong Kong and Macau. Chinese television news and major newspapers did not mention the anniversary.

In Hong Kong, several hundred people holding candles gathered at Victoria Park, creating a sea of lights covering four soccer fields.

“I hope the Chinese government will recognize this dark history,'' Eric Lau, 14, said.

Retiree Yan San, 74, said he has attended the annual commemoration in Hong Kong since its debut in 1990.

“I have persisted in coming here for 17 years because I love freedom and democracy,'' he said.

China's authoritarian government has stood by the suppression of what it has called “counterrevolutionary'' riots, saying it preserved social stability and paved the way for economic growth.

The events of June 4, 1989, shocked Hong Kongers at a time when the territory was still a British colony but preparing to return to Chinese sovereignty in 1997. The bloody suppression fueled fears that Beijing would extend its authoritarian rule to Hong Kong.

Chinese police monitored Tiananmen Square closely Sunday.

About 2,000 police were on guard in and around Beijing's “petitioner's village,'' a cluster of cheap hostels popular with people from the provinces who have come to the capital to complain to the central government.

Wang Dan, a leader in the 1989 protests who was jailed and then exiled to the United States, said in an article published in Hong Kong's Ming Pao newspaper Sunday that he holds out hope China will loosen its political controls.

“Although so far we can't see any loosening, personally I'm confident that day will come,'' he said. “Until the government reverses its position (on the 1989 protests), ordinary people won't easily forget the crackdown.''

Hong Kong leader Donald Tsang, while in China's southwestern Yunnan province to attend a regional cooperation conference, urged his fellow citizens to look at the Tiananmen crackdown practically.

“Mainland China has undergone a level of change that has gained the world's attention in the past 17 years. These changes have brought much prosperity to Hong Kong … so Hong Kong people can make an objective judgment,'' Tsang said.

Hong Kong Cardinal Joseph Zen, a fierce democracy advocate, disagreed with Tsang.

“How can we let it go? Should we just let it slide, forgive, pretend nothing happened? This is irresponsible. The successors of those responsible for the June 4 incident should give an explanation,'' Zen said.

From the Guardian Archives:

People's Army turns against the people

Monday June 5, 1989
The Guardian

It is, for all who watch and wonder about the Communist world, the ultimate obscenity. Worse even than Hungary or Czechoslovakia or Afghanistan for there the tanks and troops were alien invaders, rolling across borders in the fashion through time immemorial of big powers knocking little powers into line.But in China it is the People's Army turned against the people: shooting them indiscriminately in Tiananmen Square, on the streets, on their doorsteps, crushing them beneath tanks. A bankrupt, desperate, geriatric government, an edifice of ideology and aspiration, flaking and toppling before our eyes. We have been confronted, this week-end, by one of the great punctuation marks of 20th-century history.

No-one in the largest nation in the world will ever forget the first week of June in Beijing. A surge of desire for greater freedoms – not democracy as we know it, but an opening of society, a spirit of glasnost – has posed ultimate questions to a group of old men and, ultimately, at whatever cost, they have moved to stamp it out.

There was a chance, only a handful of days ago, that a more liberal strain of thinking within the Chinese Communist Party could, by its success in the backroom struggle for power, have harnessed the yearning for glasnost. But the old men won.

Are the manifest death throes of the Communist monoliths manageable? Can they be predicted and relied on? Could Tiananmen Square come to Red Square and savagely end a period of burgeoning hope?

The point is a starkly simple one. We, sitting comfortably in the West, assume that a spark in the individual human condition – a spark called freedom – must, in the end, make a bonfire of the system that seeks to snuff it out. We assumed, from Nixon on, that China could gradually evolve, that the business culture, the Americans with cheque books, would inevitably bring some form of democracy in their wake. Tell that, this bloody, awful morning, to the marines.

How frail is the Soviet spark? The Soviet people – because glasnost came first – may have acquired a patina of sophistication that the students of Beijing lacked. The Soviet Union is seeking to devolve power, to provoke argument, to manage change. The pensioners of the Chinese establishment had, long since, run out of ideas.

They must not get away with it. In the eyes of the West, because of the spark. And in the eyes of those who watch from Moscow, too, because the nightmare of Deng is theirs as well. We all, at root, know the Chinese march towards liberty must be resumed.

Limbaugh vs Nobody: Relativism in Action

From News of the Weird. Can't add much to this: it speaks for itself.

Wheelchair-confined Richard Paey committed almost exactly the same violations of Florida prescription drug laws that radio personality Rush Limbaugh did, with a different result: Limbaugh's sentence, in May, was addiction treatment, and Paey's, in 2004, was 25 years in prison. Both illegally possessed large quantities of painkillers for personal use, which Paey defiantly argued was (and will be) necessary to relieve nearly constant pain from unsuccessful spinal surgeries after an auto accident, but which Limbaugh admitted was simply the result of addiction. (In fact, if Limbaugh complies with his plea bargain, his conviction will be erased.) Paey's sentence now rests with a state Court of Appeal. [Tampa Tribune, 2-8-06]

mug shot o’ the week: the hobbit poisoner

The Hobbit Poisoner

Yes indeedy, according to The Smoking Gun, teenage Rosie Cotton-lookalike Katherine Smith was understudying a fifteen-year-old for the lead in a high school play when she decided to take the casting into her own hands.

Having spread the word to family and friends that she was actually playing the lead in the school's production of the no-doubt immortal "Ha," she then dosed the actual star's Mountain Dew with Clorox bleach.

Ah, if Bruce Springsteen gets ahold of this story, teenage ballads will never be the same.

Perhaps he should collaborate with Nick Cave.

Smith, who used an eye dropper to place bleach in the 20-ounce soda bottle, told a school administrator that she wanted to harm the lead actress "so she could not perform in the play." Smith's plot was thwarted when the girl smelled an unusual odor emanating from the Dew. Pictured [above] in a Tarrant County Sheriff's Office mug shot, Smith faces up to 20 years in prison if convicted of the spiking bid.

linkie o’ the day: handyman killers

Is this really Sebastian Junger? Given his experience with having the Boston Strangler as his handyman, it would only make sense. In fact, looking at Handyman Killers, quite a lot of things make sense, including the ex-roomie known to readers of the raincoaster blog as "Loserboy," the hash-addicted epileptic handyman who attempted to throw raincoaster from upstairs to downstairs. She still takes some pride in the fact that when the police got there they noted a large Nike print on his face. It was the least I could do.

Q. Are you serious about this?

A. Deadly serious

Q. How can I protect myself from handymen?Handyman as Archetype

A. You really can't. Just learn to fix things yourself. Or, if you must hire a handyman, make sure you are not in the house alone. Have a large, scary-looking friend come over at the same time.

Q. Is there any news about Jennifer Aniston on this site?

A. No. And there will not be – unless she is killed by a handyman, which is not at all outside the bounds of possibility.