Googlewracking

Ladies and gentlemen, I have found it!

I feel like the Indiana Jones of the Internet. I, raincoaster, have at last, after a search of weeks, found the one true inet-cryptogasm. In defiance of my firm belief that there is nothing, no matter how awful, that does not have a fansite…

Jocelyne Wildenstein has no fansite.

Jocelyne Wildenstein

Imagine that! At least she's prettier than the Segway, and probably marginally more biodegradeable, too.

Oh, cautionary mentions abound, but where is the luv for this obviously (expensively) broken and reassembled woman?

It is a woman, right?

This is the closest thing to a fansite I could find on all the mighty internet:

http://www.celebritybattles.com/celeb/Jocelyn+Wildenstein

and it says:

Jocelyn Wildenstein does not currently have any other celebrity or celebrity pictures sites listed. Jocelyn Wildenstein does not currently have any other pictures.

and, most crushingly:

Battles in Which Jocelyne Wildenstein Competes:

Question: Which girl is hotter?

Ranking: 8395/8530

Me-yow!

Operation Global Media Domination: Business as Usual

TIABoy, I sure am glad i warned y'all I wouldn't be blogging much over the weekend. What was it, six nine entries? Yeah, sure am glad I let you know. We also achieved our fifth-highest hits ever, thanks to some Colorado 4x4ers who are into Gay Pirate Day bigtime. Welcome off-roaders: dare I assume you like it a bit rough?

Manifest Idiocy

Canada America Done Right

The Guardian has been doing a virtual world tour of literature, and recently they featured Canada. In fact, the blog comments, meant to be a roundup of readers' favorite Canadian books, featured James Sherrett's book Up in Ontario(over there in the blogroll), so kudos to him, whatever kudos are. I hope they're chewy and taste like peanut butter fudge dipped in chocolate, but probably it's just a euphemism for a boring plaque and an arrangement of silk flowers or something.

In any case, the editor in charge may have many good points. He/She/It may be a great humanitarian, kind to the elderly, charitable, hospitable, and good with children and animals.

I. Don't. Give. A. Rat's. Ass.

I want the editor disciplined. I want the editor publicly named and shamed. I want the editor to be forced to cover Groundhog Day from Wiarton next year. I want the editor to be compelled at hockeystick-point to read all of Pierre Berton's interminable late-career mumblings. Read through this and see if you can't spot the wee little problem I have with this clueless fucking foreigner:

http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/culturevulture/archives/2006/03/21/whither_canada.html

Whither Canada
By Richard Lea/World literature tour

Thanks to you all, the world literature tour is going from strength to strength. After Finland and Poland came the Czech Republic, where alongside the Kundera and the Klima there were recommendations for Bohumil Hrabal, poems by Jaroslav Seifert, plays by Karel Capek and many, many more. There was even time for some strong words on the exclusion of Kafka
Richard was not alone in wanting to "take issue" with the decision,
complaining that we'd become confused between country and language.
Many thanks for all your contributions.

This month we can confidently predict there will be no
such confusion, as with one great leap the world literature tour
crosses the ocean and heads for Canada. Beating off strong challenges from India and Japan, we are heading for the frozen north. With suggestions ranging from Sweden to St Lucia the nominations took an increasingly personal note, with Babak voting for the country of "Tom Stoppard" and a number of anti-Atwood
protests. So much so that I'd like to declare an Atwood amnesty here
and now – any and all of your Atwood suggestions will be gratefully
received.

And don't forget to keep your nominations for next
month's destination coming – after a month up by the Arctic circle
would you all mind if I suggested a little sunshine? Unless there's
anyone else who feels like heading for Stoppard country out there …

Vermont Maple Leaves

Photograph: Toby Talbot/AP

caption: Sweet dreams…Maple leaves in Vermont

B-lot

Ink BlotSo there are several things you don't know about me. If you don't want to know, I'd suggest passing this entry by and moving along to the nice Squiddy goodness in the lower entries. If you'd like to know where the hell the Squid fixation came from (and so would I) then this might provide some answers.

I am the subject of one woman's thesis for her doctorate. Yes indeed, I and I alone am the subject of that thesis; every Wednesday (although I remember they switched the day halfway through the year, no doubt when the semesters changed and her classes got moved around, but I'm damned if I can remember if Wednesday was what they switched it from or to but one of those for sure) this woman would take me out of class and into a pleasant, sunny office with a big old grownup wooden table instead of a wee preformed formica desk and plastic chair set. The office smelled of warm dust, all year round, and in Winnipeg this was quite a feat.

She would give me tests, and I would do the tests, and she'd write things down in a notebook and I think once taperecorded it, although being a typical child of the late Twentieth Century, when I saw a taperecorder I tended to think it was Karaoke time and start singing, although that word hadn't been invented yet unless it was in Japan and got hung up in Customs, which I don't rule out. And I suppose at least some of that ended up in the thesis she was writing about me.

The psych thesis.

Psych ad

Somewhere in the bowels of the University of Manitoba lies the most detailed recording of my mind ever made. Whoa! I just thought of something! I bet I can get the University to give me a free copy; if they won't just out with it (and Universities can be like that) I could always wrench it from their feeble grasp via a Freedom of Information request, or threaten them with Privacy laws. I don't think the Privacy laws would force them to give it up, but then nobody knows what the hell these new laws do, they're all just scared to death and probably by the time they found out I wasn't entitled to my mind in written form, I'd be out the door with the tome under my arm.

God, I hope it is a tome! How embarassing if it were only a novella or even a chapbook!

This is not the time or place to discuss why she was studying me, nor even how they could tell I was…me…even at that early age. No, certainly not. For if I did, you'd have no suspense dragging you back here to troll helplessly through the Squid, poetry, jingoistic Canadianisms, and cheap cracks about curling. I may be crazy, but I'm not crazy! No, you'll just have to wait for that gumboot to drop.

Meantime, modern psychi- and psycho-s have a hell of a time dealing with me. It's critical in the mind sciences to be working from a state of beginner's mind, ie the state of having no preconceptions. And after a solid year of one test after another, even if it was back in …

Let's just skip that part, okay?

After a solid year of one test after another, I've done pretty much every test there is. And the problem is, they don't really update these things either. I was out at UBC taking part in some psych study on computer use and personality, a one-off afternoon thing, and in the debriefing they gave me a couple of standard tests. As soon as I saw the picture of the cocker spaniel in the bathroom, I asked, "So do you want me to make up a NEW story, or just tell you the one I told back when I was seven?" Turns out I knew too much, and was disqualified. I still got the pizza and the fifty bucks though.

So I've done pretty much all the tests, at least the classics, the golden oldies. And among them is this one. The one, the only, the high, the mighty:

The Rorschach Test Online

http://www.stupidstuff.org/main/rorschach.htm

Take it yourself, particularly if you never want to have to take it again. This isn't exactly the real thing, but it's pretty damn close.

Most people have heard of the Rorschach inkblot test, but not many people get to actually see the inkblots themselves because they're kept secret. StupidStuff.org has developed an inkblot test based closely on the Rorschach test protocol and materials. You can take this test yourself online and see more or less what your results would have been on a real test. Sometimes the results aren't pretty; people who take the test can find out some extremely unsettling things about themselves. When you're ready, click on the link above.

I will tell you this; in the Real Rorschach Test http://www.deltabravo.net/custody/rorschach.php, seeing an heraldic (note pedantic use of word "an;" I don't know what it signifies, but I do know enough about psych to know that it signifies something, and I know enough about psycho-s and psychi-s to know it's probably something bad) symbol in figure VIII is a good thing. Well, that's good, because…

In figure VIII I see an heraldic crest with wolverines rampant, at base the map-shape of the actual country represented (which I don't know, but if you gimme a minute I'll probably say Archenland), surmounted by a book listing the natural resources of the land with illustrations, topped by a crest which is a portrait of the group of people who liberated and, thus, founded the country. The wolverines represent the populace at large, and it is critical to note that they alone connect each of the various parts of the crest. In a break with heraldic tradition, there is neither crown nor coronet, simply an upraised torch in the hand of one of the people.

At this point the doctor usually starts wrapping things up, and writing really, really fast.

You’re a good cautionary example, Charlie Brown

Some days we all feel like this:

Charlie Brown