PSA: Downtown EastSide evictions systematically clear the way for quick-buck development

From Pivot. And if you're wondering why this has the "Olympics" tag, think it over…it'll come to you, at least by 2010 it will.

Burns Block Tenants Taking Owner to Arbitration

Vancouver: On March 30, 2006, the City of Vancouver evicted 18 tenants from the Burns Block building at 18 West Hastings for fire code violations in the building.  Tenants were ordered by police and fire officials to leave the building immediately with all their possessions.  Pivot Legal Society is now assisting former tenants in making residential tenancy claims against the owner.

“I was lucky to find a place, I only had to spend one night in a shelter,” says Alfred Melnychuk, one of the former tenants “I moved all of my belongings in a shopping cart to my new home. I’m 53 years old with bad knees, and I had half an hour’s notice of the eviction.”

Melnychuk is one of the lucky ones; at least two other tenants evicted from Burns Block are now sleeping on the street. 

The Neighbourhood Integrated Services Team inspection on March 30, 2006 that resulted in the closure of the Burns Block building was described by the City officials as a routine inspection.  It was the first such inspection by the Fire Department in almost two years. The inspectors cited four reasons for the emergency closure: (1) blocked fire exits; (2) windows to fire escapes that were screwed closed (3) untested sprinkler systems; and, (4) untested alarm systems.

“One starts to wonders if the City is treating people in the Downtown Eastside differently because they are poor,” said David Eby, lawyer for some of the tenants.  “Obviously the landlord has to be held accountable, but it’s hard to imagine the City evicting residents of an apartment building in Kitsilano with so little notice, short of a bomb in the building.”

The Burns Block building is now for sale, and the owner has received several offers.  It sits beside the future City of Vancouver tourist walkway called the “Carrall Street Greenway,” and across the street from the Woodwards development. If the building is sold, it will be the second building closed and sold to developers as a result of City of Vancouver inspection actions in the last three months, following the Pender Hotel at 31A West Pender Street, which is transferring ownership on May 15 to the condominium developer who owns 33 West Pender.  The Pender Hotel is 200 feet from Burns Block. 

The tenants are seeking damages of $5,000 plus $1,000 in moving expenses from the landlord, as well as an order that the Burns Block building be repaired so that it is available again as housing.

With the closure of Burns Block, Vancouver has lost almost 300 low-income housing units since last June.  This is in addition to 514 low-income housing units lost in the Downtown Core between June 2003 to June 2005, the loss of which accompanied a simultaneous 663 person rise in homelessness.
__________

Further Comment:     David Eby (778) 865-7997

                             Alfred Melnychuk – Room 316 – Travellers’ Hotel – 57 West Cordova Street

Superfriends explained in video

The Superfriends. You thought you knew them. You grew up with them.

But you’ve never seen them like this!!!!!

Okay, you’ve seen them like that. Sue me, it’s still funny.

But you’ve never seen them like this: A Superfriends/The Office Mashup: This Place Sucks. What goes on when the Wonder Twins aren’t looking…

And you definitely don’t know the darkest secret of the Superfriends…harboring and abusing their illegal alien Filipina maid. Presenting: Maritess vs the Superfriends!

“Da Superman, he is looking through my clothes!”

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank

Go Fuck Yersself! The Kid from Brooklyn Speaks!

I knew he'd show up on Youtube sooner or later. Ladies and gentlemen may we present Podcaster of the Millennium, the Kid from Brooklyn!

EFF’s Legal Guide for Bloggers

For Freedom's SakeBookmark it. Please.

Because if I catch you asking me any dumb questions that are answered in here I'm going to make fun of you, and nobody wants that to happen, do they?

The Electronic Frontier Foundation's Legal Guide for Bloggers

I'm going to assume you know what country you live in, and whether, therefore, any of this applies to you. Not so fast, Canucks and Brits…you're more co-opted than you thought. You need to read this, too.

Liberty waits on your typing

Hillary Justifies Her Existence

Workers of the World Unite! Even Guvmint!S 2725 IS

109th CONGRESS

2d Session

S. 2725

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide for an increase in the Federal minimum wage and to ensure that increases in the Federal minimum wage keep pace with any pay adjustments for Members of Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

May 4, 2006

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. HARKIN, and Mr. OBAMA) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions <hr>

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide for an increase in the Federal minimum wage and to ensure that increases in the Federal minimum wage keep pace with any pay adjustments for Members of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the `Standing with Minimum Wage Earners Act of 2006'.

Senator Soft...or do I repeat myself?

SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE.

    (a) In General- Section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) is amended to read as follows:
  •  
      `(1)(A) except as otherwise provided in this section, not less than–
  •  
    •  
        `(i) $5.85 an hour, beginning on the 60th day after the date of enactment of the Standing with Minimum Wage Earners Act of 2006;
  •  
    •  
        `(ii) $6.55 an hour, beginning 12 months after that 60th day, adjusted for that year as provided for in subparagraph (B); and
  •  
    •  
        `(iii) $7.25 an hour, beginning 24 months after that 60th day, adjusted each year as provided for in subparagraph (B); and
  •  
      `(B) the wage provided for under clauses (ii) and (iii) of subparagraph (A) shall be automatically increased for the year involved by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the annual rate of pay for Members of Congress increased for such year as provided for pursuant to the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31).'.
    (b) Effective Date- The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act.

Solidarity...even with politicians