300, the game! Spartans vs Persians, old-skool!

300

So the movie 300 is a jingoistic, bombastic, cartoonish, homoerotic two-hour military recruiting video. I mean, they say that as if it’s bad!

Some demented and nostalgic genius has taken this simpleminded movie and given it perhaps the ultimate Generation X accolade; he’s made a Nintendo Entertainment System game out of it.

The reviewers should have just watched this instead of wasting ten bucks and two hours of their time. As for me, I could watch and watch…pot, Pearl Jam, and Doritos optional.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank

133 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Frontier Former Editor
    Mar 16, 2007 @ 02:55:23

    Was it the Spartans at Crete, or the Cretins and Sparta?

  2. Stiletto Girl
    Mar 16, 2007 @ 14:45:45

    And I cannot wait!

    300!

    ROAR!

  3. Trackback: boy advanced advance » 300, the game! Spartans vs Persians, old-skool!
  4. Metro
    Mar 16, 2007 @ 21:42:50

    However, no matter which version you’re into, a total lack of chest hair and women is mandateory.

  5. raincoaster
    Mar 16, 2007 @ 23:55:59

    Don’t be silly Metro: they did their marital duty, or else they would have run out of Spartans pretty quickly. They just also did other things as well.

  6. Metro
    Mar 17, 2007 @ 18:08:06

    You mis-spelt that. It’s “martial” duty. Which did indeed keep them from running out of Spartans.

  7. raincoaster
    Apr 03, 2007 @ 23:05:52

    As I understand it, the Spartans got up to all kinds of things.

  8. tatter
    Apr 07, 2007 @ 15:27:02

    after i saw that movie i wanted to go home and make a speer and i keept saying we are SPARTAINS !!!!!!!!

  9. raincoaster
    Apr 07, 2007 @ 20:16:09

    That must be extremely annoying to your mother. No wonder they took Spartan boys away from civilization at seven.

  10. FiQ 3vil
    Apr 11, 2007 @ 05:04:21

    the movie was great and i cant wait 4 d game…..

    we r SPARTANS………the great warriors of sparta….

  11. raincoaster
    Apr 11, 2007 @ 05:36:41

    Well, until it comes out you can always play this one.

  12. Lil Joker
    Apr 12, 2007 @ 22:43:29

    I want the game but the graphics suck and FiQ 3vil it’s “THIS IS SPARTA” AND THATS WHEN HE KICK THE DUDE, DUDE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  13. Lil Joker
    Apr 12, 2007 @ 22:45:21

    YO tatter YOU SPELLED SPARTANS WRONG DUH, homeboy.

  14. bob
    Apr 14, 2007 @ 14:06:40

    this IS an awesome video!!!

  15. bob
    Apr 14, 2007 @ 14:11:53

    this movie is one of the best movies i have ever seen SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!!!!!

    the game should be sweeeet so you should make another one with the thousands of soldiers.

    SWEEEEEEEt!!!

  16. raincoaster
    Apr 14, 2007 @ 14:24:10

    You mean one for the Battle of Salamis? I don’t think you get a game unless you’ve been made into a movie first.

  17. Metro
    Apr 14, 2007 @ 15:45:28

    Battle of Salamis? Also known as 300 II?

  18. raincoaster
    Apr 14, 2007 @ 15:55:19

    Exactly. “The thousands of soldiers” is what made me think he was talking about that one.

  19. Primal Rage Uk
    Apr 19, 2007 @ 11:16:32

    people, people the concept of watching that film is to entice the viewer to go out and create evil as much as i liked watching that film i strongly think that its a bad role model for younger kids in this generation especially with the killing now day. I think its mainly promoting violence.

  20. raincoaster
    Apr 19, 2007 @ 11:53:20

    No, the concept of watching that film was twofold: to turn on the people who like to look at hot men and to propagandize for the war in Iraq and possible future actions in Iran and across the region. And it was so patently obvious that it turned out to be much less useful as a form of propaganda than the producers had anticipated. Public opinion is even stronger against a confrontation with Iran now than it was before.

  21. Primal Rage Uk
    Apr 20, 2007 @ 08:23:07

    I think that you cant link the war in iraq at all with 300. it is purley for a addrenilin rush because i no i was hyped up after watching that groosom film. if u ask me potentially further killing can in a sense get linked with that film. At the end of the day wat was the producer thinking and did he have a moral.

  22. raincoaster
    Apr 20, 2007 @ 15:09:21

    He had an agenda. It’s clear from the whole “Leonidas asking the oracle’s permission” scene that it is meant to parallel Bush’s subversion of the very structure of government, bypassing Congress to invade Iraq. It is absolutely clear that this is what was intended: to ennoble that illegal and un-American action. And it’s pretty clear to me that it failed.

    Sure was purty to watch, though.

  23. Primal Rage Uk
    Apr 23, 2007 @ 08:17:23

    You are trying to make ”Bush” look like a god, by trying to match him with the oracle. Also the Spartans didnt ask for permission to fight, they was forced into the decision. But i can link a bit of the war in iraq with 300 as they started the war and the spartans enemies was hatefull and was looking for a fight.

    300 was based on past events which happened hundreds maybe thousands of years ago.

  24. Primal Rage Uk
    Apr 23, 2007 @ 08:38:40

    Producers were trying to re-create the scene to give us an insight on what happened.

  25. raincoaster
    Apr 23, 2007 @ 18:23:50

    d00d, you need to do your research. Or at least watch the movie again.

    The Battle of Thermopylae is well-known and pinpointed in time. They know exactly the three days over which it happened. I’m not comparing Bush to a god: I’m saying the producers are comparing him to Leonidas, held back by those who are traitors to their country, touting a slavish adherence to law. In reality, Bush is a halfwit preppy playing cowboy: all hat, no cattle.

  26. Primal Rage Uk
    Apr 24, 2007 @ 13:36:53

    geeza, so ur trying to link leonidas with bush who has no part in war at this current moment. he a scared little boy that tries to live up to his expectation of being a warrior which i am afraid to tell you he aint.

    p.s how old are you

  27. Metro
    Apr 24, 2007 @ 16:40:56

    @Primal Rage UK:
    Raincoaster giving Bushco props? You haven’t read much on this blog, eh?

    As far as propagandizing for the Iraq war (or the Persian Excursion II if you’re of an historical turn of mind) may I direct you to the insightful and restrained analysis of Mr. Dan Savage?

    With nothing but time on my hands this week, I slipped out of the office and went to the movies. Have you seen 300 yet? It’s about a handful of lightly armed ancient Greeks–the Spartans–who take on the mighty, massive Persian army.

    Some feel the film is homophobic; some feel it’s a conservative, pro-war piece of agitprop.

    Homophobic? It’s Ann Coulter on a meth binge.

    The Persian army is an armed gay-pride parade, a threat to all things decent and, er, Greek. The king of the Spartans–among the most notorious boy-fuckers in all of ancient history–dismisses Athenian Greeks as weak-willed “philosophers and boy lovers.” The Persian emperor? An eight-foot-tall black drag queen–mascara, painted-on eyebrows, pink lip gloss. Emperor RuPaul is positively obsessed with men kneeling in front of him. Why gay up the Persians? So that straight boys in the theater can identify with the Spartan king and his 300 soldiers–all of whom appear to have been recruited from and outfitted by the International Male catalog.

    What isn’t up for debate is the film’s politics. The only times the Persian army doesn’t look like a gay-pride parade in hell, it looks like a crowd of madly chanting Islamic militants. And if the Spartan king has to break Spartan law to defend Spartan freedoms? Well, sometimes a king’s gotta do what a king’s gotta do. Because, as the queen of Sparta points out, freedom isn’t free. And, yes, she uses exactly those words. George Bush is going to blow a load in his pants when he sees this movie.

    Stolen wholesale off of Savage Love

  28. raincoaster
    Apr 24, 2007 @ 22:49:32

    Primal Rage, I’m probably a lot older than you and evidently a great deal brighter than you. I have no doubt that elements in the US government were “advising” on this film and had it turn out the way it did; where it tries to make a parallel between Bush and Leonidas is where it departs from the historic record. Savage is an innocent if he thinks any of this came as a surprise to the White House; it’s a straight-up PR move. If you didn’t understand that, great, that just proves my point that it wasn’t a very EFFECTIVE PR move.

  29. Metro
    Apr 24, 2007 @ 23:02:06

    Sorry, RC. I’ll go with the idea that the director and/or producer were shameless Bush suckers, and not in a good way. But you’re going to have to produce evidence if you’re going to call this out-and-out (but not “out”, if you understand what I mean) propaganda.

    The Path to 9/11 was written by a fawning sychophant and promulgated by ABC/Diznai .

    Come on and connect me some dots on 300, please.

  30. raincoaster
    Apr 24, 2007 @ 23:24:59

    Top Gun was rewritten at the request of their Navy advisors; this is nothing new, nothing whatsoever. Why would the producer tie his cart to a lame duck unless there was something in it for him (other than being an apologist for a loser)?

    Oh, fine. I was going to read Defamer anyway…

  31. raincoaster
    Apr 24, 2007 @ 23:56:48

    You know what’s weird? Every time I try to open a page giving me more information about Craig J. Flores, one of the executive producers, the page freezes and will not open. It won’t display a thing; I’ve tried French sites, British sites, IMDB, you name it.

  32. Metro
    Apr 25, 2007 @ 00:16:13

    The game’s afoot!

  33. raincoaster
    Apr 25, 2007 @ 01:14:17

    Apparently. I’ll give it another shot later tonight. Strange that you’d get executive producer credit on a hugely expensive movie when you have, apparently, nothing else to your name. They have no military consultants listed as such in the crew credits, so that’s why I’m checking out the producers.

    Of course, each branch of the military has its own Hollywood liason office. Maybe I should just drop them an email.

  34. Metro
    Apr 25, 2007 @ 19:35:32

    “Military consultants?” On a sword-and-bejewelled-thong epic?

    “What do you think, General Petraeus?” (Doesn’t he have the loveliest name for a closet leatherman working on a flashy, Greek, film?)
    “Wal, first get them boys some damn body armour!”
    “Sorry sir, the budget is being overseen by the Bush Administration. They’ll just have to make their own.”

  35. raincoaster
    Apr 25, 2007 @ 20:51:44

    There were military consultants on each of the previous two films about this incident.

  36. Metro
    Apr 25, 2007 @ 21:14:00

    Yeah, but I bet they spent a lot more money on wardrobe in the previous incidents.

    Curious parallels, aren’t they?

    Come to think of it, didn’t Ronald Reagan once refer to military uniforms as “costumes”?

    Interesting how this sort of stuff happens when the guys in charge have both manliness issues and dubious records of service.

  37. raincoaster
    Apr 25, 2007 @ 21:38:10

    As long as it’s so over the top that it’s ineffective as propaganda, I’m fine with it. As you know, we’re highly in favour of half-nekkid, highly decorative men.

  38. FiQ 3ViL
    May 04, 2007 @ 04:12:42

    hey3……raincoaster…u rite the men r hot lyke tat…haha…but 2 bad 4 tem…
    but is great 2….
    half-naked is no problem…ryte every1……..

  39. FiQ 3ViL
    May 04, 2007 @ 04:15:54

    d warfare in sparta last tyme is no greater than now…..
    N bush is no god 2 mi…he suffer veri one who goes 2 iraq…

    im sad 4 tem….

    2day war is not lyke tose ancient greece type…a phalanx of tem against others..
    wow

  40. arvand
    May 12, 2007 @ 22:48:36

    this movie is the worst i have ever seen maybe you should make persians look cool and have waked on there muscells

  41. arvand
    May 12, 2007 @ 22:49:21

    tyu;tuj;mkjgikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk your move i sucks id like to see the spartans beg for mercy

  42. arvand
    May 12, 2007 @ 22:50:03

    i think the spartans should lose thare hole army to the coool persians

  43. arvand
    May 12, 2007 @ 22:56:31

    this is an enfluence on iran fight against usa now the spartans should lose and persiand should ruel.the queen should die with leonidase and tthe spartans are wone of the barabaric people in the worl i mean look at there sword the look liuke pirates swords lol. this is a bad movie

  44. arvand
    May 12, 2007 @ 22:58:24

    Sorry, RC. I’ll go with the idea that the director and/or producer were shameless Bush suckers, and not in a good way. But you’re going to have to produce evidence if you’re going to call this out-and-out (but not “out”, if you understand what I mean) propaganda.

    The Path to 9/11 was written by a fawning sychophant and promulgated by ABC/Diznai .

    Come on and connect me some dots on 300, please.

    raincoaster said,
    April 24, 2007 at 11:24 pm

    Top Gun was rewritten at the request of their Navy advisors; this is nothing new, nothing whatsoever. Why would the producer tie his cart to a lame duck unless there was something in it for him (other than being an apologist for a loser)?

    Oh, fine. I was going to read Defamer anyway…

    raincoaster said,
    April 24, 2007 at 11:56 pm

    You know what’s weird? Every time I try to open a page giving me more information about Craig J. Flores, one of the executive producers, the page freezes and will not open. It won’t display a thing; I’ve tried French sites, British sites, IMDB, you name it.

    Metro said,
    April 25, 2007 at 12:16 am

    The game’s afoot!

    raincoaster said,
    April 25, 2007 at 1:14 am

    Apparently. I’ll give it another shot later tonight. Strange that you’d get executive producer credit on a hugely expensive movie when you have, apparently, nothing else to your name. They have no military consultants listed as such in the crew credits, so that’s why I’m checking out the producers.

    Of course, each branch of the military has its own Hollywood liason office. Maybe I should just drop them an email.

    Metro said,
    April 25, 2007 at 7:35 pm

    “Military consultants?” On a sword-and-bejewelled-thong epic?

    “What do you think, General Petraeus?” (Doesn’t he have the loveliest name for a closet leatherman working on a flashy, Greek, film?)
    “Wal, first get them boys some damn body armour!”
    “Sorry sir, the budget is being overseen by the Bush Administration. They’ll just have to make their own.”

    raincoaster said,
    April 25, 2007 at 8:51 pm

    There were military consultants on each of the previous two films about this incident.

    Metro said,
    April 25, 2007 at 9:14 pm

    Yeah, but I bet they spent a lot more money on wardrobe in the previous incidents.

    Curious parallels, aren’t they?

    Come to think of it, didn’t Ronald Reagan once refer to military uniforms as “costumes”?

    Interesting how this sort of stuff happens when the guys in charge have both manliness issues and dubious records of service.

    raincoaster said,
    April 25, 2007 at 9:38 pm

    As long as it’s so over the top that it’s ineffective as propaganda, I’m fine with it. As you know, we’re highly in favour of half-nekkid, highly decorative men.

    FiQ 3ViL said,
    May 4, 2007 at 4:12 am

    hey3……raincoaster…u rite the men r hot lyke tat…haha…but 2 bad 4 tem…
    but is great 2….
    half-naked is no problem…ryte every1……..

    FiQ 3ViL said,
    May 4, 2007 at 4:15 am

    d warfare in sparta last tyme is no greater than now…..
    N bush is no god 2 mi…he suffer veri one who goes 2 iraq…

    im sad 4 tem….

    2day war is not lyke tose ancient greece type…a phalanx of tem against others..
    wow

    arvand said,
    May 12, 2007 at 10:48 pm

    this movie is the worst i have ever seen maybe you should make persians look cool and have waked on there muscells

    arvand said,
    May 12, 2007 at 10:49 pm

    tyu;tuj;mkjgikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk your move i sucks id like to see the spartans beg for mercy

    arvand said,
    May 12, 2007 at 10:50 pm

    i think the spartans should lose thare hole army to the coool persians

    arvand said,
    May 12, 2007 at 10:56 pm

    this is an enfluence on iran fight against usa now the spartans should lose and persiand should ruel.the queen should die with leonidase and tthe spartans are wone of the barabaric people in the worl i mean look at there sword the look liuke pirates swords lol. this is a bad movie

    Post a Comment

  45. raincoaster
    May 13, 2007 @ 00:40:40

    Wow, somebody needs to get out of the house more.

    The Spartans, for what it’s worth, were probably a great deal more literate than you.

  46. Aaron
    May 14, 2007 @ 16:43:42

    this movies was ace. the fact that the spartans were overwhelmed and they fort till the very end is amazin this film is ace. and i cant wait for the squel were i think the 10,000 spartans go to war with the persians

  47. raincoaster
    May 15, 2007 @ 01:06:22

    No; if you recall, all 300 Spartans died. The main Spartan army served months later under Athenian command. I think the force was 15,000, but it was mostly a naval battle if I’m remembering right. My Thucydides is not what it once was.

  48. WE ARE SPARTA!!!!
    Jun 17, 2007 @ 15:48:26

    well 1st of all you all need to get your facts straight… i mean come on the sequel where 10,000 spartans fight the persian army,.. not very likely… 1st of all people tend to forget the other 7000 greeks that faught alongside leonidus and his spartan warriors until he ordered them to retreat when they found out that the pass had been deserted by their allies and they were about to be flanked by the persian armies… then people also forget about the other commander in the war (i forget his name) but he held of the persian navy to aloow the spartans not to be flanked by the ships… now back to this “sequel”, the persian goal was to burn down athens as payback for their embarrassment in Marathon… the naval commander ordered an evacuation and the persians burnt athens to the ground… after the catastrophe a double agent for the athenian army gave false information to the persian army which set the persian forces into a trap where the athenians destroyed the persian ships which left Xerxes (the persian emperor) no way to transport himself and his troops back to persia which some believe was the begining of the end of the persian empire…. lol so a great battle between the remaining spartans and persia wold be highly unlikley

  49. raincoaster
    Jun 17, 2007 @ 21:36:40

    Yes, the Athenians destroyed the Persian army…with the help of the remaining Spartans. So we’re both right.

    But I do get a snicker out of those who think of this just as a movie and graphic novel, like they could just bring them all back “oh, it was just a bad dream” or whatever.

  50. preston greer
    Jul 08, 2007 @ 13:58:12

    this movie fuckin rock no matter what ya’ll say

  51. preston greer
    Jul 08, 2007 @ 13:58:56

    rocked for the comment up from me

  52. raincoaster
    Jul 08, 2007 @ 22:03:02

    Uh, d00d, I liked the movie. But I can certainly understand, from your comprehension level, why it’s unrealistic to expect you to read the book. Even if it WAS a comic book.

  53. Stiletto
    Jul 08, 2007 @ 23:58:26

    LMAO

  54. raincoaster
    Jul 09, 2007 @ 00:05:56

    I really don;t know what it is about this movie and the fairy that brings them out, but out they come, guns a-blazing!

  55. Stiletto
    Jul 09, 2007 @ 03:29:47

    I think..it’s the fairy.

  56. shaka
    Jul 13, 2007 @ 21:32:21

    the spartans are bigger than all your souls togethher so dont say nothing about them becouse they die against a tirany like hitler so AHU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  57. raincoaster
    Jul 14, 2007 @ 03:24:47

    “Ahu” eh? “Tyranny” is a Greek word, you know.

  58. Curtis
    Aug 08, 2007 @ 23:42:26

    YA THIS MOVIE WAS GREAT TONIGHT WE DINE IN HELLLLLLLLLLLLLL

    I HOPE THE GAME IS FOR PS3 NOT JUST PSP

  59. raincoaster
    Aug 09, 2007 @ 02:36:58

    Ummmmmm, the game is in the link in the post above. Click on it.

  60. ScaryAlbino
    Aug 20, 2007 @ 06:00:49

    Look i have read all this shit.
    1. this movie was based on a GRAPHIC NOVEL written in 1962, it had no storyboards they used the book thus there is no Bush Iraq conspiracy get a life and a job then move out of your mothers basement.
    2. who said Spartans were Boy lovers? there is no proof to this day that spartan boys had any sort of man love.
    3. “bring them all back like some kind of bad dream”? the Novel was full of dramatizations, inaccuracy’s, and false facts the writers admit this!
    4. as for Mr. Savage, someone needs to look into his history a little bit better, it was very VERY common for men in the Persian empire to wear face paint that would resemble mascara today it was to strike fear into the enemy giving the wearer a look of sunken eyes.
    5. ok i have killed all your little theory’s so now you can go back to playing your computer games and wasting your lives and raincoaster, take the helmet off, No Russian spy planes are watching you.

  61. raincoaster
    Aug 20, 2007 @ 06:28:23

    2: you don’t read Greek, do you?

  62. Comicreader
    Aug 22, 2007 @ 07:16:48

    Whats with you people… this is no propaganda film. Go read the freekin comic. It’s been out for ages and the movie follows ALL of the comic almost to each individual scene.

    This was just another smart move by the people that have been grabbing quality comic books (frank miller btw *the author*) and turning them into a new source of income.

    Stop reading stuff into something that was in the works well before all this BS happened over seas with Bush involved. Miller never kept to the original story of the 300 besides they go they fight etc… but he made a good comic book and it turned into a good action movie. That’s it… The people look how they look for dramatic effect, and adaptation from the comic book as best could be done… That was the illustrators job… not some political nazi.

    It was just a comic book turned into a movie and even maintained 99% of the comic book. Nothing more, nothing less.

  63. raincoaster
    Aug 22, 2007 @ 08:23:42

    Film. We were talking about the film. We were talking about parallels between the film and the propaganda of the US, and the timing of the release of the film, which the producers admit was manipulated at the request of the government.

    Nobody is talking about the graphic novel except you graphic novel nerds.

  64. ben
    Sep 22, 2007 @ 20:53:27

    what’s up with not making 300 for the Ps2. man that’s so messed up

  65. raincoaster
    Sep 22, 2007 @ 23:31:45

    Don’t look at me. I’m all about the NES.

  66. huseyin-y-k
    Sep 30, 2007 @ 08:43:25

    mn dobra e igrickata original

  67. huseyin-y-k
    Sep 30, 2007 @ 08:43:58

    gft myfgmguy,uhuhuyfdhymn yedhnrrtmksr

  68. raincoaster
    Sep 30, 2007 @ 08:45:01

    Aaaaaaand in English that would be????

  69. pov
    Oct 13, 2007 @ 20:28:21

    it was nice movie

  70. pov
    Oct 13, 2007 @ 20:31:24

    but to much wiealence but afcors the wiealance was<abit funny and afcors this movie was historic

  71. r-i-s-h-y-1-2-3
    Oct 14, 2007 @ 20:30:53

    the film was the best film ive ever seen when i seen it all i did was go out and buy all ps2 games like that but no romans or anything like that i just brought SPARTAN game!!!! i agree with ben ive got the game on psp but i wont it on ps2 so that was just so stupid im out cya

  72. Anthony M
    Oct 16, 2007 @ 17:46:49

    When I saw this move I started to think, Ya I think I could live through it. From a child plunged in to violance “shit man thats easy stuff. It was wimpy having kids fight kids to make them stronger but living in the wild alone to fight weather and nature “NOW THATS A CHALLENGE FOR ME” I would accept.

  73. Abhinav
    Oct 16, 2007 @ 19:52:48

    Man it would have been better if remedy or ubisoft made that game instead of nitendo……..graphics suck.

  74. Alfred B.
    Oct 28, 2007 @ 23:27:41

    I can’t believe some of these shallow comments regarding the movie 300, I saw the movie and liked it very much. The movie has no link to the war in iraq nor does it promote violence. The movie is based on actual historic events in which King Leonidas and 300 spartans fought to the death against King Xeres and his massive persian army. The spartan code was to live only to serve Sparta, to die in battle for the service of Sparta was considered to be a “Glorious death”. People who believe that the movie is linked to the war should research spartan history. People who beleive the movie promotes violence in children should consider helping their children distinquish real life violence from movie or TV volence.

  75. raincoaster
    Oct 28, 2007 @ 23:30:49

    Yes, yes, I studied Spartan history and Greek literature and read the historic accounts, thank you very much. But the producers have admitted they played up elements to resonate with people thinking about the war in Iraq, so if you disagree, take it up with the producers of the film.

  76. Metro
    Nov 02, 2007 @ 21:24:23

    @Alfred B.
    Ah, then you’ll love this.

  77. Jovan
    Nov 06, 2007 @ 23:35:16

    this is jovan !
    i´m an spartan (Y)

  78. raincoaster
    Nov 06, 2007 @ 23:50:40

    Howdy, Jovan! How did you like the movie?

  79. mat
    Nov 25, 2007 @ 06:47:05

    lol the game is retorted……. no
    offense meant to the maker

  80. raincoaster
    Nov 26, 2007 @ 00:50:26

    “Retorted,” eh, sweetie?

  81. bob
    Dec 08, 2007 @ 16:12:36

    WHY CAn’t YOU MAKE THIS GAME ON PS2 OR PS3?!?! IT WOULD BE SOOOOO MUCH BETTAH BUT I LOVE DA FILM IT WAS SSOOOOO GOOD

  82. raincoaster
    Dec 08, 2007 @ 17:52:25

    But… this game is the NINTENDO NES version. You read the blog post, of course.

    Right? Right?

  83. kstafford
    Dec 17, 2007 @ 02:55:40

    You can play similar mods of Medieval Total War 1 & 2 as well as Rome Total War.

    There was actually a Hellenistic mod made for the original medieval that was freakin’ wicked awesome. One of the scenario battles you could fight was Thermopylae, with the Persians eventually outflanking your Spartan and assorted allied hoplites (don’t even get me started on the historical inaccuracy of the film) from the rear and causing near total routs.

    Coincidentally, I’m mildly obsessed with the Brittania expansion for MTW2. The Norweigans are mighty fun when going on Viking excursions.

  84. raincoaster
    Dec 17, 2007 @ 03:20:36

    From what I heard, the Spartans were the ones who preferred to be in the rear most of the time.

  85. kstafford
    Dec 17, 2007 @ 03:24:33

    Indeed. Sparta, where the men are brave and the sheep are scared.

  86. raincoaster
    Dec 17, 2007 @ 04:29:43

    That’s why they call it “Greek” you know.

  87. B8B
    Feb 07, 2008 @ 00:43:42

    hi

  88. B8B
    Feb 07, 2008 @ 00:49:12

    gay friuts is this what u do in your spare time f#$* u dicks

  89. raincoaster
    Feb 07, 2008 @ 01:47:48

    Sweetie, you do need to at least TRY to read for comprehension. But thanks for the two links to raincoaster! Technorati will love you!

  90. braden
    Feb 10, 2008 @ 02:36:41

    that movie was KOOL.

  91. raincoaster
    Feb 10, 2008 @ 04:39:16

    Indeed it was. Nothing like watching buff, half-naked men being macho for a couple of hours.

  92. alex
    Mar 19, 2008 @ 15:28:00

    This game rocks

  93. william burken
    Mar 22, 2008 @ 19:52:03

    all right one thing you all have wrong is 1 spartain still survived the on whom lost his eye and gave leonides wive his necklace. DUH

  94. Kevin Stafford
    May 06, 2008 @ 19:32:44

    LMAO at the recent “trackback” :)

  95. raincoaster
    May 06, 2008 @ 19:58:14

    Is kilt.

  96. Daniel
    May 15, 2008 @ 16:15:18

    Some of you have it parly right, not all are correct though.

    The king used the allied greeks’ phalanx when the first wave of troops hit, to tire out the persian troops, then he ordered back the greeks and sent in the spartans to wreak havok on the persians, at the time the “Spartiates” as they were called. The elite full citizen’s of the spartan army were the best of the best, they were uncontested. The persians short weapons and weak armor was no match for the spartans, apparently the first wave of persians was cut to shreads with only three spartan deaths. The persians wepons were so useless that the persians started trying to take the spartan spears off them in battle, so the spartan’s switched to short swords, which they were leathal with.

    Then xerxies sent his best, the “immortals” who were also cut to shreads.

    Even after sending the allied greeks home the spartans held their own, king leonidas died and the spartans surrounded his body and defended it with such ferosity(sp?) that the persians fell back and killed all the spartans with bows.

    The persians could not break the spartan phalanx, there was only one time in recorded history where a spartan phalanx was broken which was very close to the time of sparta’s downfall.

    And whoever said spartans only helped in the battle of Plataea, is wrong.

    The other greek states asked sparta three times, practicly begged for sparta’s help for the battle, sparta was the major power in greece at the time, and had the best warriors.

    They did not simply “help”. The spartans sent 45,000 men, 5000 “spartans”(not all warriors in sparta were Spartiates, they were the elite)

    This is a large sum of men considdering at it’s height sparta had 8000 Spartiates, maximum. The spartan force was the majority of the men at that battle.

  97. Daniel
    May 15, 2008 @ 16:21:31

    Oh and i forgot to add, the naval battle did not help leonidas, it was leonidas who held back the persians for long enough for the greeks to plan the naval battle and win.

    It is widely thought that if leonidas had not stood his ground for those three days, greece would have been overwhelmed, then europe, the reason who persia invaded greece was because it was his gateway to europe. This would have made a great impact on the worlds history.

    Some could even say, he changed the world, or infact stopped it from changing dramaticly.

    The numbers were still amazing for the battle in itself, at the time it was the largest army ever assembled. He had roughly 260,000 men, to leonidas’ 7,500(ish).

    Many, Many more persians died to that of the greeks.

  98. breanna
    May 29, 2008 @ 21:00:01

    The movie 300 is hard and it rocks rock on

  99. kasuya
    Jul 28, 2008 @ 20:00:03

    the movie is unlike any thing i have seen.

    The naraitor tells the story perfect.

    lianaiders the only real sparten i have ever seen.THIS IS SPATA!

  100. Jono
    Aug 22, 2008 @ 07:40:51

    the movie ROX

  101. sara
    Oct 29, 2008 @ 01:51:46

    I like games

  102. andres
    Nov 02, 2008 @ 16:33:06

    nerds!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  103. ooopinionsss
    Dec 03, 2008 @ 11:00:07

    How you think when the economic crisis will end? I wish to make statistics of independent opinions!

  104. KING ADAM
    Dec 13, 2008 @ 21:27:12

    kstafford is such a piece of s***

  105. KING ADAM
    Dec 13, 2008 @ 21:33:56

    oh i forgott to add antone who comments on this site(apart
    from me) is a stupid twat with nothing better to do with their time

  106. raincoaster
    Dec 14, 2008 @ 01:47:47

    Look at the little troll, just getting his sea-legs. Isn’t he sweet? It’s probably the first time he’s been off Club Penguin and out in the real world. Awwww.

  107. jure
    Dec 27, 2008 @ 10:05:52

    when i saw the movi a had no coment i wish that i em spartans sparta is my mother i realy like that scen when leonidas go in war but dont cry “no place for weknes not in sparta only hard can make themselvs cals spartans only the hard only the brave” “spartans ready your breakfest and eat harty for tonight we dine in hell”

  108. jure
    Dec 27, 2008 @ 10:07:14

    when i saw the movi a had no coment i wish that i em spartans sparta is my mother i realy like that scen when leonidas go in war but dont cry “no place for weknes not in sparta only hard can make themselvs cals spartans only the hard only the strong” “spartans ready your breakfest and eat harty for tonight we dine in hell”

  109. jure
    Dec 27, 2008 @ 10:07:47

    simpli best film ewer

  110. jure
    Dec 27, 2008 @ 10:08:26

    THIS IS SPARTA

  111. pupa
    Jan 09, 2009 @ 00:09:52

    Do u know were i could play the game online

  112. host
    Mar 15, 2009 @ 09:45:52

    no one can defet me

  113. raincoaster
    Mar 15, 2009 @ 10:45:36

    That is undoubtedly true, because there’s no such thing as “defet.”

  114. ian in hamburg
    Mar 15, 2009 @ 12:17:23

    Make that 113. :-)

  115. raincoaster
    Mar 16, 2009 @ 14:27:59

    Onward and upward!

  116. bob marley
    Mar 19, 2009 @ 20:15:44

    pooooooooop

  117. raincoaster
    Mar 19, 2009 @ 20:41:36

    Scatalogical messages from the dead! Kewl!

  118. rueben
    Mar 26, 2009 @ 08:40:36

    i love your movie 300.

    its so cool

  119. G Eagle Esq
    Mar 26, 2009 @ 21:48:22

    Your Grace

    I dinnae ken how I can better that Sage who opined in circumstances alike about similarly mal-adjusted Chelsea Football Supporters or their Ilk:

    Arma virumque cano et

    Your obedient servant etc

    G E

  120. raincoaster
    Mar 27, 2009 @ 00:39:15

    Virgil was a lousy screenwriter.

  121. billy
    Apr 18, 2009 @ 13:38:13

    the cretins were at crete but the fled to protect there homeland leaving the spartians to fight alone

  122. raincoaster
    Apr 18, 2009 @ 21:55:30

    The cretins were also in the comment section.

  123. okorie22
    Jul 20, 2009 @ 14:58:53

    it is good

  124. raincoaster
    Jul 21, 2009 @ 00:20:55

    Succinct. Positive. I like it. More reviewers should take their inspiration from you.

  125. john
    Nov 27, 2009 @ 08:04:35

    this website sucks

  126. raincoaster
    Nov 27, 2009 @ 19:06:39

    No it doesn’t. What sucks is when someone posts your email where spammers can grab it john_J@hotmail.com

  127. mudhooks
    Dec 06, 2009 @ 22:03:29

    My friend’s daughter played Leonidas’ daughter in the film. Sadly, she didn;t get to meet Gerard Butler. She did her short scene in front of a green screen on a sound stage in Montreal.

  128. raincoaster
    Dec 06, 2009 @ 22:24:18

    He had a daughter? It was so macho all I remember was the son.

    And all the makeup-enhanced abs.

    http://ayyyy.com/2009/11/17/a-glimpse-of-stocking/

  129. bob the biulder
    Dec 28, 2009 @ 14:50:47

    sarah clunes is a bitch

  130. bob the biulder
    Dec 28, 2009 @ 14:52:46

    ben is leonitis

  131. raincoaster
    Dec 28, 2009 @ 20:02:03

    Do you mean Leonides?

  132. kjf09
    Jan 12, 2010 @ 15:09:03

    SPARTANS PREPARE FOR GLORY CAUSE TONIGHT WE DINE IN HELL.

  133. raincoaster
    Jan 13, 2010 @ 13:41:59

    Leonidas would NEVER say “CAUSE” at any volume.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Click to submit! You know you want to.