British terror suspects named

Fuck Censorship!The Guardian reports that pressure has been brought to bear on the media by the Metropolitan Police, the Home Secretary and the Attorney General of the UK to prevent media coverage of the suspects, amid fears that such coverage may prejudice a trail.

Of course, this begs the question of how fair can it be show greater respect for privacy of these particular suspects than any regular old suspects, who could and would be named with impunity. If the system is so irrevocably broken that merely stating “Mr. So-and-So has been arrested” will prejudice the trial, how then can it be fair to name other suspects in other crimes?

Let justice be blind; either outlaw the release of names or allow it. Interference by the judiciary, the legislature, or law enforcement in the dissemination of information is arbitrary and truly prejudicial. Does this interference mean that all other trials in Britain are unjust, and we’re okay with that?

The suspects:

The names on the Bank of England website are:

Walthamstow, London E17

Muhammed Usman Saddique, 24, lives in Albert Road. Attends Queens Road mosque

Waheed Zaman, 22, head of Islamic Society at London Metropolitan University

Assan Abdullah Khan, 21, lives in Banbury Road with brother and fellow suspect Abdula Ahmed Ali

Waheed Arafat Khan, 25, lives in Farnan Avenue

Cossor Ali, 23

Osman Adam Khatib, 19, lives in Wellington Road

Amin Asmin Tariq, 23, security guard at Heathrow

Abdula Ahmed Ali, 25, lives in Banbury Road with brother and fellow suspect Assan Abdullah Khan

Ibrahim Savant, 25, lives in Alkam Road. Changed name from Oliver Savant when converted to Islam. Attends Queens Road mosque

Poplar, London E14

Umair Hussain, 24

Stoke Newington, London

Shamin Mohammed Uddin, 35, oldest of the known suspects

Chingford, Essex

Nabeel Hussain, 22

Leyton, London E10

Tanvir Hussain, 25

Clapton, London E5

Abdul Muneem Patel, 17, youngest known suspect

High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire

Waseem Kayani, 29, reported to have recently returned from Pakistan, where he married

Umar Islam, 28, West Indian Christian background; changed name from Brian Young when converted to Islam

Assad Sarwar, 26, believed to have attended the Muslim Education Centre in Totteridge Drive. Brother of suspect Amjad Sarwar

Shazad Khuram Ali, 27, believed to have attended the Muslim Education Centre in Totteridge Drive. Runs car import business, AKZ Trading. Brother of suspect Haider Ali

Birmingham

Tayib Rauf, 22, lives in Ward End. Works with brother at father’s cake business, Classic Confectionery Supplies. Brother, Rashid, arrested in Pakistan

Not on the Bank of England list:

Walthamstow

Atika Sidyot, wife of Ibrahim Savant. Reportedly pregnant

High Wycombe

Amjad Sarwar, 28, works at Shazad Khuram Ali’s car business, AKZ. Brother of Assad Sarwar UPDATE not arrested, not questioned. The Bank of England apparently released as “arrested” the name of a man who wasn’t even interviewed.

Adbul Waheed (or Wahid), 21, changed name from Don Stewart-Whyte when converted to Islam

Haider Ali, works for his brother Shazad Khuram Ali’s car business, AKZ

Unnamed, woman in her twenties with a six-month-old child

5???

I am obviously out of the dirty word waiting to happen loop here. Valleywag‘s published a list of 83 words you can’t communicate on Verizon Wireless, and sure enough most of them are pretty obvious: fuck, dago, spic, spankthemonkey (although it doesn’t rule out spank the monkey of course) and so on.

But 5???

I’m obviously missing something. Got to get out more.

the real reason I’m publishing this list is the more creative entries: “fleshpopsicle,” “spearchucker,” and “whiteswallow” (which I thought was one of the birds Craig Newmark feeds in his backyard). Like an 11-year-old boy, we had not thought of saying these words until we heard them, but now those words taste so good in our mouths.

Use the phrase “flesh popsicle” in a sentence today.

Disclosure: As far as I can tell, certain (but not all) entries from Gawker Media blogs are republished through Verizon and thus fall under these guidelines.

———- Forwarded message ———-

No Content provided to Subscribers of Verizon Wireless from Content Providers, whether in the form of text, audio, images, video or otherwise, may contain any of the words listed in Appendix A. This includes any variations in spelling of the words (e.g., fuck, phuck, fucks, fucker, fucked, fucking, etc.), any variations in pronunciation of the words (e.g., nigger, nigga, niggahs, etc.) or any combinations or creations containing any of the words (e.g., ass, assboy, asslicker, uptheass, etc.).

Nonetheless, it is not possible to compile a definitive list of unacceptable words. Language is fluid, with new words and phrases regularly entering the public vocabulary, and established meanings may change over time. For this reason, the list of prohibited words in Appendix A may change from time to time and is not meant to be all-inclusive.

anal
ass
bastard
beatoff
bitch
BJ
cameljockey
chink
circlejerk
clit
cock
coolie
coon
cornhole
cum
cunt
dago
deepthroating
dickhead
dickwad
dildo
dyke
eatme
fag
faggot
fellatio
fisting
fleshflute
fleshpopsicle
fornicate
fuck
fudgepacking
gangbang
genital
getlaid
gobtheknob
goldenshower
gook
hairpie
hardon
homo
honkey
jerkoff
jewboy
jizz
5
kike
lesbo
limey
manloaf
masturbate
muffdiver
nigger
nutsack
paki
panface
poontang
pubic
pussy
queef
queer
raghead
rimjob
rubyredbag
scrotum
shit
sitonmyface
sixtynine
slag
slant
sodomize
spankthemonkey
spearchucker
spic
spooge
teabagging
testicles
twat
vagina
wetback
whackoff
whipitout
whiteswallow
wop

blog post o’ the day: Guido lays the smackdown on the puppetmasters

What are you afraid of? 

From, obviously, Guido Fawkes. I take some small credit for pointing him towards this article in Sploid.

The alleged U.K. terror plot has been investigated for months by British intelligence, and the idea that the airliner attacks were planned for today seems to be nothing more than political fabrication and media hysteria.

Tony Blair and George W. Bush even planned the terror freakout in a series of phone calls that began last Friday and continued through the weekend. Blair and Bush put the finishing touches on their diabolical operation in a phone call early Wednesday, the Associated Press revealed today.

That’s right: While millions of travelers are going through absolute hell today because of the sudden terror “news,” it was last week when the U.S. president and U.K. prime minister began their cold calculations on how to get the maximum political benefit from the months-old investigation.

“U.S. President George W. Bush seized on a foiled London airline bomb plot to hammer unnamed critics he accused of having all but forgotten the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks,” AFP noted this afternoon.

“Weighed down by the unpopular war in Iraq, Bush and his aides have tried to shift the national political debate from that conflict to the broader and more popular global war on terrorism ahead of November 7 congressional elections.”

But the American warmongers are hardly alone in V for Fighting Brown Offneeding a “terror boost” for their fading political fortunes. The timing of the hysteria was even more useful to Blair, who was on the verge of being thrown out of Downing Street last night.

“A Scottish MP last night quit the government in protest at Tony Blair’s handling of the Middle East crisis, amid warnings from ministers that the Prime Minister’s continuing support for American foreign policy could cost him his job,” the Scotsman reported this morning.

“Jim Sheridan, Labour MP for Paisley and Renfrewshire North, became the first to resign from a government post over the war. He quit as parliamentary private secretary to the Ministry of Defense, saying he could no longer accept that Scottish airports were being used to refuel United States planes carrying arms to Israel.”

The newspaper made it crystal clear that Blair had mere days left in power, with some 150 members of parliament demanding Blair’s enemy Jack Straw call the politicians back to London, even though they’re on summer break:

“His resignation came as ministers furious at Mr Blair’s handling of the crisis said they would push for an emergency recall of parliament in a maneuver they hoped would trigger the Prime Minister’s downfall.”

Unlike the theoretical “massacre” of the theoretical terror plot that will soon be exposed in the courts as another make-believe scheme, actual massacres continue uninterrupted in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon.

At least 2,000 Iraqis were slaughtered in July alone, most in Sunni vs. Shiite violence that has exploded under the U.S. occupation. Baghdad continues to be the capital of death, but the bloodshed happens everywhere, every day, all the time. Today in Najaf, another religious shrine was blown up, leaving at least 35 dead and another 100 hurt.

Morons and Patsies

If the suspected terrorists are anything like the amateur morons arrested recently in Toronto, London and Florida, the “terror plot” will eventually be revealed to be nothing more than idiot fantasies encouraged by the usual intelligence agents.

While Muslim nations will continue be bombed by the United States and Britain, travelers are stranded all over the Western World and England’s beleaguered Pakistanis can expect a new round of bogus terror raids, constant police harassment and attacks by neo-fascist skinheads, Bush and Blair can expect a solid boost for their bloodstained political parties.

The only other beneficiaries of today’s insanity are the “homeland security” and private-army industries, the defense contractors and the personal-hygiene business — having taken our corkscrews, pocket knives and fingernail clippers, airport goons are now seizing shampoo, deodorant, hair gel, toothpaste and pretty much everything else in your toiletries kit.

Not that you can even have a carry-on with your toothpaste and other essentials. As of today, British airports have banned all carry-ons.

Miserable passengers have been photographed standing around with nothing more than a clear plastic baggie holding their tickets and passports.

It’s the world of the future, and it sucks.

And you have to endure it iPodless. There is no god, people.

Unite!

Here’s Guido‘s post:

“It’s the Wolf! It’s the Wolf!”

Facts:

  • The tangible support of the U.S. and tacit support of the U.K. for Israel’s thrust into Lebanon has caused a political backlash for Bush and Blair.
  • In Afghanistan a woefully under-equipped and politically mis-directed British military intervention is in tatters, the death toll is rising and British forces have been forced to reduce their risk in the face of rising casualties. Tory critics are angry.
  • In Iraq senior U.S. military figures are openly describing the situation as one of increasing insurgency on the path to full-scale civil war.
  • Political unease and outright opposition to the “war on terror” is rising, even from people like Guido, who supported the liberation of Iraq and Afghanistan.
  • Blair might be on the beach in the Carribbean, but he is in a danger zone politically. The coming Labour party conference is the focus of malcontents and a source of instability. Thatcher and Gorbachev had coup attempts launched against them when they were out of the country. His internal opponents are now drowned out by the scare.
  • Bush needed a security scare. Rove spins “the Democrats are soft on terror.”

Time for a terror boost…

Strength, Unity, Terror
The cast : an ongoing long-term investigation into terror suspects. Extras : thousands of held up holidaymakers.
Gimmicks : this time it is liquid bombs, following on from the previous Ricin, Red Mercury and Anthrax Powder scares.
Show date : silly season when the media is desperate, prior to party conference and the symbolic 9/11 anniversary.
Playing : all news channels, front pages

Ask yourself, why now? Do you really believe that a huge terrorist conspiracy was under way?

Or that, if it was, it was alone?

how are we fighting the war on terror?

From the Onion. Keep on fightin’ that TWAT!

FIGHT THAT TWAT!!!

the practical uses of terror

I worked with TWAT. TWAT was a friend of mine. And you, sir, are a twat. 

I know Aldous Huxley and George Orwell wrote the originals, but this, from the Cato Institute via BoingBoing, is a very practical explanation of just how useful a state of terror can be to a government who wants to hang onto power when the people want to freshen up the litter box.

Only traitors try to make us afraid of terrorists

In this mind-blowing, exhaustively researched Cato institute paper by Ohio State University’s John Mueller, the case against being afraid of terrorism is laid out in irrefutable logic, backed with credible, documented statistics about terrorism’s risks. From the number of fatalities produced by terrorism to the trends in terrorism death to the fact that almost no one has ever died from a military biological agent to the fact that poison gas and dirty bombs in the field do only minor damage — this paper is the most reassuring and infuriating piece of analysis I’ve read since September 11th, 2001. The bottom line is, terrorism doesn’t kill many people. Even in Israel, you’re four times more likely to die in a car wreck than as a result of a terrorist attack. In the USA, you need to be more worried about lightning strikes than terrorism. The point of terrorism is to create terror, and by cynically convincing us that our very countries are at risk from terrorism, our politicians have delivered utter victory to the terrorists: we are terrified. Mushroom clouds for everyone!

Much of the current alarm is generated from the knowledge that many of today’s terrorists simply want to kill, and kill more or less randomly, for revenge or as an act of what they take to be The shock and tragedy of September 11 does demand a focused and dedicated program to confront international terrorism and to attempt to prevent a repeat. But it seems sensible to suggest that part of this reaction should include an effort by politicians, officials, and the media to inform the public reasonably and realistically about the terrorist context instead of playing into the hands of terrorists by frightening the public. What is needed, as one statistician suggests, is some sort of convincing, coherent, informed, and nuanced answer to a central question: “How worried should I be?” Instead, the message the nation has received so far is, as a Homeland Security official put (or caricatured) it, “Be scared; be very, very scared — but go on with your lives.” Such messages have led many people to develop what Leif Wenar of the University of Sheffield has aptly labeled “a false sense of insecurity.”