blog comment o’ the day: A (suggested) Statement from David Cameron

Although it’s actually from Susan Thorpe, over in the BoJo Flamewar. Dream on, if you think any politician has what it takes to sign something like this, brilliant though it is.

“I am not the Prime Minister of Great Britain, but I have high hopes of one day achieving this exalted office. Until that time, whilst I may sway the incumbent government’s policies, I am only able to influence our government and not implement policies of my own. However, even though I do not enjoy governmental pre-eminence, I offer, on behalf of Britain, my deepest condolences and sympathies to the peoples of Lebanon and Palestine. I would like to add that I hope that we can work together in the future to rectify and repair relations between Britain and the Middle East.

Insofar as Britain was the last nation to govern the territory of Israel and Palestine prior to resolution 181 of the United Nations, I consider the difficulties in Israel and Lebanon to lie, to a certain extent, at our doorstep. As a consequence of this historical obligation I feel it behooves any British government to do its utmost to expedite peace in this region; even if such actions may strain our relationship with our allies, the United States and Israel.

To this end I call for impartial international re-assessment of the activities of Israel in the occupied territories of Palestine and a similar examination of its recent military activities in Lebanon. I also recommend that Britain withdraw diplomatic relations with Israel until the leaders of that country comply with all outstanding UN resolutions and rectify any officially recorded abuses of humanitarian rights in the occupied territories and Lebanon.

I recognize that this statement will cause anger and dissent in the ranks of the elected members of my party and those many members of the Conservative Party in the community. I further recognize that this standpoint may cost me the leadership of this party. Regardless of these dangers, I am no longer prepared to stand by and, through inaction, condone the chronic and intolerable abuses being perpetrated in this region. I can no longer, in all honour, sit in silence while such transgressions persist without any word of condemnation or action from the international community.

If this standpoint causes me to lose electoral votes, so be it. The votes it costs are well spent in raising public awareness of the gross violations of international law perpetrated by the Israeli government daily. In the event that sinister influence causes me to lose my leadership and perhaps my seat in the house, I trust that my replacement will take up this issue with the same desire for investigation, reconciliation and, ultimately peace.”

Canada vs Coulter, age 45

Canada wins, with a smackdown. And don’t give me none o’ that “but there were Canadians there as observers, there were Canadians who left to join the US Army” shit. Yes indeed, but (once more, loudly, for the people drooling in the back row):

CANADA DID NOT SEND TROOPS TO VIETNAM

as Ann Coulter, 45, learns to her dismay, confusion and, of course, ongoing refusal to face facts.

from, of all places, Perez Hilton, who has always been good to Canuckistan.

Total Eclipse of Good Taste

Really, is there a Seventies song that cannot be improved by the addition of a little heroin and a lot of pent-up domestic rage?

Apparently not. From BoingBoing, although they featured the Google vid and I hate those. “Buffering” my ass; they’re just sitting there laughing at you through your webcam.

Nathan sez, “The band features Kristopher Schau, who also is also lead singer of The Cumshots. They made headlines two summers ago during the Quart Festival in Norway by featuring a live sex show by members of Fuck For Forest – a porn company that donates its profits to forestry charities.”

hell on earth

from somebody who knows hell:

“The darkest places in Hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis.”

–Dante

fashion week Tehran

Suri??? Is that you?The Manolo, he does not shy away from the controversy. Superfantastic!

She has got the Bette Davis eyes! he says.

Kind of him, really. Forget Sharia law, anyone who put those colours together should be flogged!

And so should many of his commenters, who don’t seem to understand that it’s a fashion show for hijabs, habayas, or whatever you want to call them. That we’re not going to see rubber Alaias is a given here. The question is what can you do with what you’re allowed, which is the great political question of the age in all countries, and the fact is that most of these outfits are shiteous, even in context.